Patent Trolls Still Can’t Find A Way Through Alice’s Looking Glass

We (and others) have written frequently and at length about the impact of Alice v. CLS Bank on patent litigation—how the test set out in that case has enabled litigants and courts to obtain an early determination of whether a patent claims a viable invention or just an abstract idea. Parties who assert patents in...

FTC Issues Long–Awaited Patent Troll Study

The Federal Trade Commission today announced the publication of its formal study of the problem of patent trolls—which the Commission more politely refers to as “patent assertion entities” or “PAEs.” Using its investigative authority, the Commission examined non–public information for 2009–2014 from 22 PAEs, 327 PAE affiliates, and 2,100 holding entities. The FTC divided the...

When You *Can* Say It Any Plainer Than That

One of the peculiar features of most patent litigation—and one reason it is so expensive—is the process of claim construction. The courts have decided that disputes over the language of patent claims must be decided by the trial judge because they are “questions of law” not “questions of fact.” And that has come to mean...

Uneasy Times For Patent Trolls?

There is some evidence to suggest that we have reason to give thanks this season for the downward slide of the phenomenon of the non–practicing entity (NPE) a/k/a patent assertion entity (PAE) a/k/a patent troll. By any name, businesses that acquire patents for the purpose licensing and litigation are in the news, and not for...