2022
Mass. SJC Affirms U.S. Auto Parts’ Victory in Closely Watched State Tax Dispute
David Swetnam-Burland / 0 CommentsOn December 22, 2022, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, in a unanimous opinion written by Justice Wendlandt, held that the Massachusetts Department of Revenue cannot apply the U.S. Supreme Court’s opinion in South Dakota v. Wayfair retroactively against Brann & Isaacson client, U.S. Auto Parts Network, Inc. The Court held that the Department’s Internet Vendor...
Read More2021
Brann & Isaacson Wins Summary Judgment for U.S. Auto Parts in Massachusetts Tax Dispute
David Swetnam-Burland / 0 CommentsOn January 28, 2021, the Massachusetts Appellate Tax Board granted summary judgment in favor of Brann & Isaacson client, U.S. Auto Parts, and abated a sales tax assessment dating to October 1, 2017. The Massachusetts Department of Revenue had assessed U.S. Auto Parts, which did not have a physical presence in Massachusetts, under its Internet Vendor...
Read More2017
ACMA and NetChoice Prevail In Challenge To Massachusetts Tax Rule For Internet Sellers
David Swetnam-Burland / 0 CommentsOn June 28, 2017, in response to a lawsuit filed by Brann & Isaacson on behalf of the American Catalog Mailers Association and NetChoice, the Massachusetts Superior Court entered an immediate judgment halting implementation of Massachusetts Department of Revenue Directive 17–1, “Requirement that Out-of-State Internet Vendors with Significant Massachusetts Sales Must Collect Sales or Use...
Read More2017
Brann & Isaacson Files Challenge To Massachusetts Rule Targeting Internet Retailers
David Swetnam-Burland / 0 CommentsOn Friday, June 9, 2017, American Catalog Mailers Association and NetChoice filed suit against the Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Revenue to block implementation of a Massachusetts rule, due to go into effect on July 1, 2017, under which certain Internet retailers without any physical presence in Massachusetts would nonetheless be required to collect...
Read More