2017
Patent News Grab–Bag
David Swetnam-Burland / 0 CommentsSome news of note for this Valentine’s Day week: N.D. Cal. Orders Early Damages Disclosures: The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has amended its local patent rules to require the parties to (1) provide the court with a good–faith (non–binding) estimate of the damages range expected for the case at the...
Read More2016
Timing Is Everything: Alice in East Texas (Again)
David Swetnam-Burland / 0 CommentsWell, we warned you that Alice v. CLS Bank was going to remain a hot topic in 2016. Two more data points to support that theory have emerged, each of which, in a different way, relates to the proper timing of a judicial decision on the legal question of whether a patent’s claims are written...
Read More2015
Digital Downloads Aren’t “Articles”; New Rules For Alice In East Texas
David Swetnam-Burland / 0 CommentsA couple more newsworthy items to report on this week: * In a closely watched case in the Federal Circuit, a split panel of that court has held that the International Trade Commission does not have jurisdiction to protect against alleged patent infringement based on “importation” by digital download. Over a vigorous dissent from Judge...
Read More2015
Letter Request Requirement in East Texas Takes An Absurdist Turn
David Swetnam-Burland / 0 CommentsWe’ve written before about the unique requirement some judges in the Eastern District of Texas impose on accused infringers, requiring them to obtain leave of court before filing a motion testing the patent–eligibility of an asserted patent under Alice v. CLS Bank. This requirement makes it harder for accused infringers to get a dispositive issue...
Read More2015
Alice Needs A Judicial Visa To Enter East Texas
David Swetnam-Burland / 0 CommentsEast Texas continues to stand out among federal judicial districts for its (contrarian) approach to patent cases. Where the judges in other judicial districts have found the Supreme Court opinion in Alice v. CLS Bank a useful tool to use early in cases to weed out patents that shouldn’t have been granted—you can see a...
Read More2014
Federal Circuit Acknowledges That, Yes, Alice Did Change The Game
David Swetnam-Burland / 0 CommentsThe yo–yo of Ultramercial v. Hulu has come to rest at last, and should prove to any doubters that the Supreme Court’s Alice v. CLS Bank opinion has changed the patent litigation game. The Ultramercial case has been adrift in cross–currents between the Federal Circuit and the Supreme Court for years now. In 2010, the...
Read More