Self-Incrimination, Patent Style

/ 0 Comments

With a tip of the hat to Docket Navigator, for pointing out this interesting slant on an otherwise uninteresting procedural motion. The issue arose in the context of negotiating a protective order governing the exchange of confidential information, a routine (if crucial) preliminary step in most pieces of complex litigation. In short, Defendant wanted assurances...

Read More
separator

Patent Profiting

/ 0 Comments

With a tip of the hat to IP Watchdog for alerting us to a new, novel, and controversial way to make a quick buck on patents. As reported by the Wall Street Journal, hedge fund manager Kyle Bass — with the help of Erich Spangenberg, formerly known as the patent troll that everyone loved to...

Read More
separator

Getting its Due

/ 0 Comments

As we’ve mentioned in the past, the U.S. Copyright Office is the redheaded stepchild of intellectual property protection. Unlike the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office – a federal agency in its own right, albeit one with somewhat strained resources – the U.S. Copyright Office operates under the aegis of the Library of Congress. Which is...

Read More
separator

Likelihood of Confusion in a War on Two Fronts

/ 0 Comments

The Supreme Court issued an opinion in a trademark case the other day with interesting implications for those of you who defend – or defend against – trademark portfolios. The case, B&B Hardware v. Hargis Industries, involved a trademark opposition running tandem with a trademark infringement lawsuit over a square off between the marks SEALTITE and...

Read More
separator

The Cares of In-House Counsel

/ 0 Comments

The latest annual survey of chief legal officers by the Association of Corporate Counsel, which came out last month, provides interesting insight into the topics that keep in-house counsel on their toes. Perhaps unsurprisingly, data breaches and protection of corporate data made the list – with more than a quarter of the respondents reporting that...

Read More
separator

Nothing Special About A Specialty Court

/ 0 Comments

The Supreme Court reminded everyone, once again, that just because patent cases are heard by a special court of appeals, they are not governed by special rules that apply only to patent cases. In Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., the Court ruled 7–2 that when there are subsidiary factual issues in claim construction,...

Read More
separator

“Equity aids the vigilant, not the sleeping ones”

/ 0 Comments

Latin Proverb Laches is one of those words that law students pay a great deal of money to learn the meaning of in law school. Essentially, the doctrine of laches permits a defendant to raise as a defense to a claim the argument that the plaintiff unjustifiably delayed in bringing the claim. In the patent...

Read More
separator

Guidance through the Patent Eligibility Thicket

/ 0 Comments

As readers of our blog are well aware, the Supreme Court has certainly shaken matters up when it comes to patent eligibility, the “threshold” inquiry to test a patent’s mettle under Section 101 of the Patent Act. In particular, the Court’s recent opinion in Alice has proven to have implications as deep as the rabbit...

Read More
separator

Good Enough For Patent Law, Good Enough For Copyright Law…

/ 0 Comments

Google copies Java’s method headers in its API for Android. Java’s creator, Sun Microsystems, is purchased by Oracle. Oracle sues Google for copyright infringement. (Admit it. That last bit didn’t surprise you). The district court finds that the API method headers aren’t protectable under copyright. The Federal Circuit reverses—Java API taxonomy is copyrightable as a...

Read More
separator